Peer Reviewed Open Access

This paper is reviewed in accordance with the Peer Review Program of IRA Academico Research

A Case Study on the Use of Inquiry-Based Instruction to Improve Science Learning in Junior High Schools in Ghana

Ibrahim, Mohammed Gunu, Ayisha Gomda, Lateef Adebayo Oseni
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jems.v18.n3.p5
Abstract
The study examined how Inquiry-Based Learning affects students' academic progress in science lessons and whether this approach can help low-proficiency users of English to comprehend scientific concepts. The study used a Quasi-Experimental design and looked at it through the lens of Self-Determination theory. The study included a total of 40 second-year Junior High School students from two distinct classes. The research was aimed at students aged between 13 and 15 years, and therefore, only students within that age range were selected to participate. Students in the experimental group received Inquiry-Based instruction, while the control group used traditional instruction. The study lasted for four weeks and was an experimental one. To see if Inquiry-Based learning is more effective than traditional teaching, a test with 20 questions was used as a pre-test and a post-test for both the experimental group and the control group. The results of the study showed that students who were taught using an inquiry-based method scored higher than those who were taught through a traditional technique. The main finding of this study is that students in the experimental group, who had a low level of English proficiency, were able to understand the lesson without switching to their native language to explain concepts.
Keywords
Inquiry-Based, learning, Instruction, Junior High School, students
Full Text:
PDF
References

Aditomo, A. & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International journal of science education,42(4), 504–525.

Ampiah, J. G. (2008). An investigation of provision of quality basic education in Ghana: A case study of selected schools in the Central Region of Ghana. Journal of international cooperation in education, 11(3), 19-37.

Anamuah-Mensah, J. (2012). Forward, In A. Asabere-Ameyaw, G. J. S. Dei, & K. Raheem (Eds.). Contemporary issues in African sciences and science education. Sense publishers, pp. ix-xii.

Aslan, S. (2019). The Impact of Argumentation-Based Teaching and Scenario-Based Learning Method on The Students’ Academic Achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.171

Aulls, M., Magon, J. K., & Shore, B. (2015). The distinction between inquiry-based instruction and non-inquiry-based instruction in higher education: A case study of what happens as inquiry in 16 education courses in three universities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.011

Barone, D. & Barone, R. (2019). Valuing the Process and Product of Inquiry-Based Instruction and Learning. Journal for the education of the gifted,42(1), 35–63.

Bevevino, M., Dengel, J., & Adams, K. (1999). Constructivist Theory in the Classroom Internalizing: Concepts through Inquiry Learning. The Claaring House, 72(5), 275-278.

Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education (Salem, Mass.),94(4), 577–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20390

Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real-world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 878-898.

Boxall, M., Boxall, M., & Lucas, S. (2010). Nurture groups in schools: principles and practice (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Bryman, A. (2015). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526.

Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 13-19.

Cetin, P. S. (2021). Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Laboratory Instruction on Developing Secondary Students’ Views on Scientific Inquiry. Journal of chemical education, 98(3), 756–762.

Chang, C. Y., & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of educational research, 92(6), 340-346 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597617

Chang, Y. L., & Wu, S. C. (2018). A case study on developmental changes of eleventh graders' scientific inquiry competences. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 14(1), 363-382 https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79838

De Menezes, H. Z. (2020). The importance of Science, Technology, and Innovation for the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals/A importancia da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao para implementacao dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentavel. Meridiano 47, 21. https://doi.org/10.20889/M47e21015

De Vaus, D. (2001). Research design in social research. London: Sage Publications

Deci, E. L.& Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health. Canadian Psychology = Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.

Derseh, W. B. &Nurie, B. Y. (2021). Using inquiry-based writing instruction to develop students’ academic writing skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00108-9.

Dostál, J. (2015). The definition of the term “Inquiry-based instruction.” International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.826a

Eltanahy, M. & Forawi, S. (2019). Science Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of the Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning Instruction in a Middle School in Dubai. Journal of Education (Boston, Mass.), 199(1), 13–23.

Eyal, O. & Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275.

Foxley, S. (2020). As the government looks to the future of the economy, the importance of science and technology is evident. The Estates Gazette, 39–39.

Frisch, J. K., Jackson, P. C., & Murray, M. C. (2018). Transforming undergraduate biology learning with inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9155-z

Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi: 10.1002/job.322

Gilal, F.G., Zhang, J. Paul, J. & Gilal, J.A (2019).The role of self-determination theory in marketing science: An integrative review and agenda for research. European Management Journal, 37(1), 29-44.

Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M.-A. K. (2011). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 77–95. doi: 10.1007/s11218-011-9170-2.

Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students' behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School psychology international, 29(3), 328-347 https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673 .

Hiltunen, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Keinonen, T. (2020). Biology student teachers’ dialogic talk in inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Biological Education, 54(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1575264.

Hodson, D. (1992). In search of a meaningful relationship: An exploration of some issues relating to integration in science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 14(5), 541–562.

Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory’s motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1175–1188. doi: 10.1037/a0028089

Jeno,L.M., Grytnes, J.A., & Vandvik,V. (2017). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students' motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education107, 1-12.

Kinnafick, F-E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Duda, J. L. (2014). Physical Activity Adoption to Adherence, Lapse, and Dropout: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 24(5), 706–718.https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314528811

Ku, K. Y. L., Ho, I. T., Hau, K.-T., & Lai, E. C. M. (2014). Integrating direct and inquiry-based instruction in the teaching of critical thinking: an intervention study. Instructional Science, 42(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9279-0

Kuhn, D. (2016). Learning is the key twenty-first century skill. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 88–99.

Lazonder, A. W. & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance. Review of educational research, 86 (3), 681–718.

Lord, T. R. (1999). A Comparison Between Traditional and Constructivist Teaching in Environmental Science. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 22-28.

Martell, C. C. (2020). Barriers to Inquiry-Based Instruction: A Longitudinal Study of History Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841880

McLaughlin, C. A. & MacFadden, B. J. (2014). At the Elbows of Scientists: Shaping Science Teachers’ Conceptions and Enactment of Inquiry-Based Instruction.Research in Science Education, 44(6), 927–947.

Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347

Murphy, P., Lunn, S., & Jones, H. (2006). The impact of authentic learning on students' engagement with physics. The Curriculum Journal, 17(3), 229–246.

Núñez, J. L., Fernández, C., León, J., & Grijalvo, F. (2015). The relationship between teacher’s autonomy support and students’ autonomy and vitality. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21, 191–202. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2014.928127

Ozel, M. &Luft, J. A. (2013). Beginning Secondary Science Teachers’ Conceptualization and Enactment of Inquiry-Based Instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 113(6), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12030.

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175. doi: 10.1080/00461520903028990.

Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Nguyen, U., & Dasgupta, N. (2019). Inquiry-Based Instruction in Science and Mathematics in Middle School Classrooms: Examining Its Association With Students’ Attitudes by Gender and Race/Ethnicity. AERA Open, 5(3), 233285841986765–. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419867653

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

Shumba, O. (1999). Critically interrogating the rationality of western science vis-à-vis scientific literacy in non-western developing countries. Zambezia , xxvi (i), 55-75.

Simsek, P., & Kabapinar, F. (2010). The effects of inquiry-based learning on elementary students' conceptual understanding of matter, scientific process skills and science attitudes. Procedia-social and behavioural sciences, 2, 1190-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.170

Stofflett, R. T. (1998). Putting Constructivist Teaching into Practice in Undergraduate Introductory Science. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2), n2.

Tawfik, A. A., Graesser, A., Gatewood, J., & Gishbaugher, J. (2020). Role of questions in inquiry-based instruction: towards a design taxonomy for question-asking and implications for design. Educational technology research and development, 68(2), 653–678.

Vergara-Díaz, C., Bustamante, K., Pinto, L., & Cofré, H. (2020). Exploring Chilean seventh grade students’ conceptions of Earth dynamics before and after model- and inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(4), 360–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1725406

Vorholzer, A. & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction - an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1616124

Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2018). Interaction rituals and inquiry‐based science instruction: Analysis of student participation in small‐group investigations in a multilingual classroom. Science Education (Salem, Mass.), 102(5), 1107–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21462

Yamagata, S. (2018). Comparing core-image-based basic verb learning in an EFL junior high school: Learner-centered and teacher-centered approaches. Language Teaching Research : LTR, 22(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816659784

Yuen, K.-M., & Hau, K.-T. (2006). Constructivist teaching and teacher-centred teaching: a comparison of students’ learning in a university course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290600750861


©IRA Academico Research & its authors
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This article can be used for non-commercial purposes. Mentioning of the publication source is mandatory while referring this article in any future works.