Email this article 
This paper is reviewed in accordance with the Peer Review Program of IRA Academico Research
George Eliot and Cosmopolitanism—An Interpretation from Appiah’s Theoretical Perspectives
Abstract
The fundamental idea of cosmopolitanism is that all human beings, regardless of their political stance or national identity, should share a common ethical framework and responsibilities on a global scale. However, while cosmopolitanism appeals to the concerns of all humanity, it also poses the problem that people may lose focus on their own national affairs. This paper analyzes George Eliot’s two works, Daniel Deronda and Impressions of Theophrastus Such, to illustrate her views on cosmopolitanism, especially the relationship between nationalism and cosmopolitanism. By utilizing philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah’s concepts of cosmopolitanism, such as “cosmopolitan patriotism,” “impartial cosmopolitanism,” and “partial cosmopolitanism,” the paper concludes that it is the “partial cosmopolitanism” that Eliot pursues. In two of her works mentioned in this paper, Eliot is concerned about the indifference to nationalism that cosmopolitanism can bring, yet she also worries about the narrowness that nationalism can foster. Thus, in Daniel Deronda, Deronda combines nationalism and cosmopolitanism, becoming a cosmopolitan patriot who travels East with an inclusive spirit to realize his national ideals. Eliot integrates nationalism and cosmopolitanism, harmonizing the sense of ethnic belonging with the demands of global citizenship, with the hope that people can achieve a better moral state.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Albrecht, T. (2012). “The balance of separateness and communication”: Cosmopolitan ethics in George Eliot’s Daniel Deronda. ELH, 79(2), 389-416.
Anderson, A. (2001). The powers of distance: Cosmopolitanism and the cultivation of detachment. Princeton University Press.
Appiah, K. W. (1997). Cosmopolitan patriots. Critical Inquiry, 23(3), 617-639.
Appiah, K. W. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. W. W. Norton & Company.
Appiah, K. W. (2007). The ethics of identity. Princeton University Press.
Bernard, S. (1994). George Eliot and the politics of national inheritance. Oxford University Press.
Bodenheimer, R. (2016). George Eliot’s last stand: Impressions of Theophrastus Such. Victorian Literature and Culture, 44, 607-621.
Caine, B. (2010). Writing cosmopolitan lives: Joseph and Kwame Anthony Appiah. History Workshop Journal, 70(1), 152-171. http://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbq023
Cheah, P. (2006). Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 486-496.
de Graef, O. (2011). “A common humanity is not yet enough”: Shadows of the coming race in George Eliot’s final fiction. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 9(1), 17-39.
Eliot, G (2012). Middlemarch. Penguin Classics.
Eliot, G (2013). Daniel Deronda. HarperCollins.
Eliot, G. (1879). Impressions of Theophrastus Such. Munsey’s.
Friedman, S. S. (2018). Cosmopolitanism, religion, diaspora: Kwame Anthony Appiah and contemporary Muslim women’s writing. New Literary History, 49(2), 199-225. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2018.0011
Henry, N. (1996). Ante-anti-semitism: George Eliot’s Impressions of Theophrastus Such. In R. Robbins & J. Wolfreys (Eds.), Victorian Identities: Social and Cultural Formations in Nineteenth-Century Literature (pp. 65-80). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Henry, N. (2003). George Eliot and the British empire. Cambridge University Press.
Henry, N. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to: George Eliot. Cambridge University Press.
Hollinger, D. A. (2001). Not universalists, not pluralists: The new cosmopolitans find their own way. Constellations, 8(2), 236-248.
Horvat, K. V. (2020). Cosmopolitan patriotism. In M. Sardoč (Ed.), Handbook of Patriotism (pp. 127-140). Springer International.
Jeffers, C. (2013). Appiah’s Cosmopolitanism. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51(4), 488-510. https://doi.org/510. 10.1111/sjp.12040
Kurnick, D. (2010). Unspeakable George Eliot. Victorian Literature and Culture, 38(2), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150310000136
Lovesey, O. (2017). Postcolonial George Eliot. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Miller. M. L. & Ury. S. (2015). Cosmopolitanism: The end of Jewishness? In M. L. Miller & S. Ury (Eds.), Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and the Jews of East Central Europe (pp. 16-49). Routledge.
Newton, K. M. (2018). George Eliot for the twenty-first century: Literature, Philosophy, Politics. Springer International Publishing.
Robbins, B. (2010). Victorian cosmopolitanism, interrupted. Victorian Literature and Culture, 38(2), 421-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150310000094
Robbins, B. (2013). The cosmopolitan Eliot. In A. Anderson & H. E. Shaw (Eds.), A companion to George Eliot (pp. 400-412). John Wiley & Sons Limited.
Small, H. (2012). George Eliot and the cosmopolitan cynic. Victorian Studies, 55(1), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.55.1.85
Small, H. (2020). The function of cynicism at the present time. Oxford University Press, Incorporated.
Stević, A. (2017). Convenient cosmopolitanism: Daniel Deronda, nationalism, and the critics. Victorian Literature and Culture, 45(3), 593-614.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This article can be used for non-commercial purposes. Mentioning of the publication source is mandatory while referring this article in any future works.
