Peer Reviewed Open Access

This paper is reviewed in accordance with the Peer Review Program of IRA Academico Research

Gender Similarities and Differences in the Usage of Stance Markers: A Study Based on Twenty TED Speeches

Jie Zhuang
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jems.v20.n1.p2
Abstract
The past few decades have witnessed the hot discussion concerning language and gender from various aspects, with the use of stance markers as one of the most vital angles. To find out the gender similarities and differences in the use of stance markers under the classification by Hyland, figure out the gender features and summarize the behind reasons, this article combines the qualitative and quantitative analysis together, conducts a detailed analysis on twenty TED speeches delivered by ten male and ten female lecturers, respectively. Finally, the study finds that firstly, there are no distinctive differences in the use of stance markers in the primary class proposed by Hyland named hedges, boosters, attitude markers and self-mention. But the female lecturers use stance makers more frequently on the whole. Secondly, in terms of secondary class which complemented by other scholars, still no obvious differences are found in terms of hedges and attitude markers. Then, for the use of boosters, the males prefer fact-asserting while the females tend to use certainty-indicating. As for the employment of self-mention markers, words indicating authority such as I are more frequently used by males and those contributing to solidarity between the speaker and audience such as we are more commonly applied by females. The discovery of gender similarities and differences involves various reasons, and it provides important implications for the study of oral English.
Keywords
gender, stance markers, similarities, differences, TED speeches
Full Text:
PDF
References

Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text-interdisciplinary journal for the study of discourse 9(1): 93-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93

Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, et al. (1999). Longman, Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Bilaniuk, L. (2003). Gender, language attitudes, and language status in Ukraine. Language in society 32(1): 47-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503321037

Berman, R. A. (2005). Introduction: Developing discourse stance in different text types and languages. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2): 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.003

Cook, A. S., Fritz, J. J., McCornack, B. L. & Visperas, C. (1985). Early gender differences in the functional usage of language. Sex Roles 12(9/10): 909-915.

Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of personality and social psychology 59(5): 941-951. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941

Coates, J. (2003). The role of epistemic modality in women’s talk. Topics in English Linguistics (44): 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339

Coates, J. (2015). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. Routledge

De Gaer, E. V., Pustjens, H., Damme, J. V., & Munter, A. D. (2007). Impact of attitudes of peers on language achievement: Gender differences. The journal of educational research, 101(2), 78-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.2.78-93

Davis, L., & Reynolds, M. (2018). Gendered language and the educational gender gap. Economics letters 168, 46-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.04.006

Goodhew, S. C., Reynolds, K., Edwards, M., & Kidd, E. (2022). The Content of Gender Stereotypes Embedded in Language Use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 41(2): 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X211033930

He, Z. R. 模糊限制语与言语交际[Hedges and verbal communication]. Journal of Foreign Languages, 1985, (5): 29-33. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=GARc9QQj0GXbkInfX4zh7HybtgLUhV4z 8WQ9YJKD9VsyCbr2CNE-R6chp4pj6MiwWDRG6jbrVXdKvX9IGEHwNNKXzj9tM U93XPBY5VxAN1kZRUUryR_lONsR_bVgkElB6L6hG4fxq6o=&uniplatform=NZKP T&language=CHS

Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. Written Communication 18(4): 549-574. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0741088301018004005

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461445605050365

Holmes, J., & Schnurr, S. (2006). ‘Doing femininity’ at work: More than just relational practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1): 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00316.x

Hosman, L.A., & Siltanen, S. A. (2006). Powerful and powerless language forms their consequences for impression formation, attributions of control of self and control of others, cognitive responses, and message memory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 25(1):33-46. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X05284477

Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and woman’s place. Harper & Row.

Lindqvist, A., Renström, E, A. & Sendén, M. G. (2019). Reducing a male bias in language? Establishing the efficiency of three different gender-fair language strategies. Sex Roles 81: 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9

Meyerhoff, M., & Ehrlich, S. (2019). Language, gender, and sexuality. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5, 455-475. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-052418-094326

Marín-Arrese, J. I. (2021). Stance, emotion and persuasion: Terrorism and the press. Journal of pragmatics177:135-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.022

Precht, K. (2008). Sex similarities and differences in stance in informal American conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1):89-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00354.x

Reilly. J., Zamora. A., & McGivern, R. F. (2005). Acquiring perspective in English: the development of stance. Journal of Pragmatics 37(2): 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.08.010

Sczesny, S., Formanowicz, M., & Moser, F. (2016). Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers in psychology 7: 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00025

Thuube, R. M., & Ekanjume-Ilongo, B. (2017). Exploring stance and listener alignment in public discourse. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35(4): 345-355. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2017.1398096

Voss, J. F., & Dyke, J. A.V. (2001). Narrative structure, information certainty, emotional content, and gender as factors in a pseudo jury decision-making task. Discourse Process 32(2-3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651599

Wu, G. Q. (2010). 英汉研究论文中作者身份之建构对比分析[Identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study]. Shanghai International Studies University. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=GARc9QQj0GXpDt7G5cFKD50Tqkcfal397tdc0j3P3aHjn3kKJb5-qec5WDBFgBRhphM57df1iOzNfpn6xyk3OjBGyB0YX9ruzAM HCnUk7psZc4k2H1fDAzhvCukiHG203r-mAi2S1hWvPgpe4in49A==&uniplatform=NZ KPT&language=CHS

Widodo, H. P. & Elyas, T. (2020). Introduction to gender in language education. Sexuality & Culture 24(4): 1019-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09753-1

Zhang, J. D., & Xia, M. R.A. 性别语言立场标记语的使用特征——一项基于英国国家口语语料库的研究 [gender study on the stance markers in Britain spoken English corpus]. Foreign Languages Research, (2015), 32(06):10-16+112. doi: 10.13978/j.cnki.wyyj.2015.06.003. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=GARc9QQj0GUd-hNsHTo7Vgx8voGCA9NxsMEEAOq4TPmTxr4lCjnJ3eA9UGPtUOI4iW_bTZ8v-2KQ1eN4CIqhNQlkOsupFIc_D2R5cTLDwcW9O6Tim_54SfHpYmZ3SgeWPOJuvRSDAUItYE7QOlaPxw==&unip latform=NZKPT&language=CHS


©IRA Academico Research & its authors
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This article can be used for non-commercial purposes. Mentioning of the publication source is mandatory while referring this article in any future works.