Peer Reviewed Open Access

This paper is reviewed in accordance with the Peer Review Program of IRA Academico Research

An Analysis of Attitude Resources in the Reading Materials of New Horizons College English (4th Edition) from the Perspective of Eco-linguistics

Jin WeiJia
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jems.v22.n2.p6
Abstract
This study examines the attitude resources in six ecologically themed texts from New Horizons College English (4th Edition) from the ecological discourse perspective. Using the UAM Corpus Tool software for annotation and statistical analysis, combined with qualitative and quantitative methods, the study investigated the distribution of attitude resources and the ecological orientation in the texts. Two findings emerged in the results. In terms of the distribution of attitudes, a relatively balanced distribution was observed among affect, judgement, and appreciation, with each subsystem emphasizing certain constituent within itself: the highest proportion of insecurity/security in affect resources reflects editors’ concerns about ecological crises; negative evaluations in judgement resources reflect critical attitude toward behaviors that harm nature; and negative evaluations in appreciation resources express editors’ dissatisfaction with the current ecological situation. In terms of ecological orientation, the three types of attitudes were relatively evenly distributed, with negative resources being used most. In practical implications drawn from the study, it is proposed that textbook compilers should enhance ecological awareness, increase the proportion of texts with ecological beneficial attitudes, and enhance the topical coverage of ecological topics, so as to improve the guidance and enlightening nature of the textbooks in ecological teaching.
Keywords
Ecolinguistics, Attitude Resources, Ecological Orientation, College English Textbooks, Discourse Analysis.
Full Text:
PDF
References

Alexander, R., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104–110.

Fill, A. (1998). Ecolinguistics: States of the art. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 23(1), 3–16.

He, W., & Ma, Z. (2020). The appraisal system from the perspective of ecolinguistics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 43(1), 48–58. (in Chinese)

Li, R., & Zhang, H. (2025). A study on ecological literacy representation in high school English textbooks in China. Foreign Language Studies, (1), 57–63. (in Chinese)

Li, S., & Liu, C. (2020). Ecological discourse analysis based on appraisal theory: A case study of Trump’s speech on withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, (5), 65–76, 149. (in Chinese)

Liu, F., & Hood, S. (2019). Rhetorical strategies of political persuasion: The play of irrealis and realis meaning in re/aligning readers in newspaper editorials. Text & Talk, 39(5), 589–611.

Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal system in English. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Miao, X., & Lei, L. (2019). Ecological discourse analysis based on systemic functional linguistics. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 40(1), 13–22. (in Chinese)

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live by. London: Routledge.

Wang, Z. (2001). The appraisal system and its operation: A new development in systemic functional linguistics. Foreign Languages, (6), 13–20. (in Chinese)

Xin, Z., & Huang, G. (2013). Systemic functional linguistics and ecological discourse analysis. Foreign Language Teaching, 34(3), 7–10, 31. (in Chinese)

Yu, H., & Wang, L. (2020). A study of transitivity analysis model in ecological discourse: A case study of educational discourse. Foreign Language and Foreign Language Teaching, (6), 43–54, 120, 148. (in Chinese)


©IRA Academico Research & its authors
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This article can be used for non-commercial purposes. Mentioning of the publication source is mandatory while referring this article in any future works.