This paper is reviewed in accordance with the Peer Review Program of IRA Academico Research
Role of divisional management styles in the suitability and success of adopted organizational structure
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Armour, H. O., & Teece, D. J. (1978). Organizational structure and economic performance: A test of the multidivisional hypothesis. The Bell Journal of Economics, 106-122.
Barlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind. Harvard business review, 68(4), 138-145.
Hill, C. W., Hitt, M. A., & Hoskisson, R. E. (1992). Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organization Science, 3(4), 501-521.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1992). Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure.
Jones, G. R. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1987). Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights. California management review, 29(4).
Mohr, L. B. (1971). Organizational technology and organizational structure.Administrative Science Quarterly, 444-459.
Muscarella, C. J., & Vetsuypens, M. R. (1990). Efficiency and organizational structure: a study of reverse LBOs. The Journal of Finance, 45(5), 1389-1413.
Sayles, L. R. (1976). Matrix management: the structure with a future.Organizational Dynamics, 5(2), 2-17.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1993). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources . Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative science quarterly, 501-524.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. This article can be used for non-commercial purposes. Mentioning of the publication source is mandatory while referring this article in any future works.